.jpg)
MANILA, Philippines—Despite the passage of the sin tax law, the prices of cigarettes in the Philippines remain among the lowest in Southeast Asia, an antismoking group said yesterday.
Emer Rojas, president of New Vois Association of the Philippines, said the first edition of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) Tobacco Atlas showed that the country continued to have one of the lowest prices of cigarette products in the region and even in the world.
“For example, local brand Fortune is pegged at 58 centavos and Marlboro at $1.16 a pack. But in Singapore, which is one of the Asean countries with good tobacco control policies, a pack of Marlboro is sold at $9,” said Rojas, a laryngeal cancer survivor.
He said the Philippines had been lagging behind her Asean neighbors in terms of tobacco control so that even with the sin tax law approved last year, the price increases were still not enough to catch up with her counterparts in the region.
“We were only able to achieve a tax burden of 53 percent of the retail price. This is still short of the recommended 70-percent tax burden of the World Health Organization (WHO),” Rojas said.
So far, only Singapore has complied with the WHO recommendation while Thailand’s tobacco tax rate is at 69 percent, he said.
Released by the Bangkok-based Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (Seatca), the Asean Tobacco Atlas is the first ever publication that details the tobacco epidemic in the 10-member association.
It contains information on smoking prevalence, prices, deaths, health burden and tobacco control policies, among other things.
Rojas said 10 percent of the world’s tobacco consumers, or 127 million adults, are found in the Asean region with the majority in Indonesia (65 million). The Philippines comes in second with 17.3 million smokers.
An estimated 9.25 billion cigarette sticks are consumed by Asean smokers on a daily basis, according to Seatca.
According to the Tobacco Atlas, Filipinos spend an estimated P326.4 million on cigarette products every month. Despite the huge expenditure on cigarettes, the government allots only P11.45 million to tobacco control.
Rojas said that aside from imposing higher taxes on cigarette products, the government should work on getting approval of the graphic health warning law to help curb the country’s tobacco epidemic.
“We know from the experience of our Asean neighbors like Singapore and Thailand that high tobacco prices and huge picture-based warning labels are effective measures in reducing consumption and discouraging the youth from taking up smoking,” he said.
Source:http://business.inquirer.net/141355/cigarette-prices-in-ph-still-among-lowest-despite-sin-tax-says-report
REFLECTION:
Source:http://business.inquirer.net/141355/cigarette-prices-in-ph-still-among-lowest-despite-sin-tax-says-report
REFLECTION:
The article stated that the country continued to have one of the lowest prices
of cigarette products in the region and even in the world though the Sin Tax Bill was approved last year. We were only able to achieve a tax burden of 53 percent unlike Thailand which have a tax rate of 69 percent while Singapore has complied the 70 percent tax burden recommended by World Health Organization (WHO).
In my opinion, Sin Tax Bill can really help the economy of the Philippines for it can help to increase the government's revenues. This Bill can also be used as funds for the health care of the people.It is said that Funding of universal healthcare is assured of 80 percent of the incremental revenue that will be allocated for the universal healthcare. Twenty percent will be for medical assistance and health enhancement facilities.Additional funding for tobacco farmer’s livelihood support on top of subsidy provided by RA 7171 and RA 8240 is one of the benefits of the Bill too. It also leads to gradual shift to a unitary taxation to simplify the current structure of taxes, to prevent the excise taxes from being eroded by inflation and to discourage consumption of sin products.
We can't deny the fact that Sin tax Bill can really help the economy but this is not enough to give the people their health support. Since the tax rate of our cigarette is lower than what is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), people will continue to buy the product. If people will continue to buy cigarette people will continue to lessen their life span. Different health problems will occur and people will tend to ask the government for a health support and this will add to the problem of the government.
I suggest that the government should not only focus on imposing higher taxes for cigarettes but they should also impose a strong campaign or advocacy to warn people about the bad effect that the cigarette might cause them.
